Pryss, Rüdiger and Schlee, Winfried and Reichert, Manfred and Kurthen, Ira and Giroud, Nathalie and Jagoda, Laura and Neuschwander, Pia and Meyer, Martin and Neff, Patrick and Schobel, Johannes and Hoppenstedt, Burkhard and Spiliopoulou, Myra and Langguth, Berthold and Probst, Thomas (2019) Ecological Momentary Assessment based Differences between Android and iOS Users of the TrackYourHearing mHealth Crowdsensing Platform. In: 41st International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference, July 23–27, 2019, Berlin, Germany.
Download (153kB)
Abstract
mHealth technologies are increasingly utilized in various medical contexts. Mobile crowdsensing is such a technology, which is often used for data collection scenarios related to questions on chronic disorders. One prominent reason for the latter setting is based on the fact that powerful Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) can be performed. Notably, when mobile crowdsensing solutions are used to integrate EMA measurements, many new challenges arise. For example, the measurements must be provided in the same way on different mobile operating systems. However, the newly given possibilities can surpass the challenges. For example, if different mobile operating systems must be technically provided, one direction could be to investigate whether users of different mobile operating systems pose a different behaviour when performing EMA measurements. In a previous work, we investigated differences between iOS and Android users from the TrackYourTinnitus mHealth crowdsensing platform, which has the goal to reveal insights on the daily fluctuations of tinnitus patients. In this work, we investigated differences between iOS and Android users from the TrackYourHearing mHealth crowdsensing platform, which aims at insights on the daily fluctuations of patients with hearing loss. We analyzed 3767 EMA measurements based on a daily applied questionnaire of 84 patients. Statistical analyses have been conducted to see whether these 84 patients differ with respect to the used mobile operating system and their given answers to the EMA measurements. We present the obtained results and compare them to the previous mentioned study. Our insights show the differences in the two studies and that the overall results are worth being investigated in a more indepth manner. Particularly, it must be investigated whether the used mobile operating system constitutes a confounder when gathering EMA-based data through a crowdsensing platform.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Subjects: | DBIS Research > Publications |
Divisions: | Faculty of Engineering, Electronics and Computer Science > Institute of Databases and Informations Systems > DBIS Research and Teaching > DBIS Research > Publications |
Depositing User: | Ruediger Pryss |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jun 2019 16:22 |
Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2020 13:13 |
URI: | http://dbis.eprints.uni-ulm.de/id/eprint/1795 |